COP30's NEW MEMO:
ENERGY TRANSITION MEANS ECONOMIC TRANSITION

WITHIN two months world leaders are expected to leave the planet’s 30th international climate summit with a fresh perspective on the energy transition. 

Unlike 29 Conference of Parties before it, COP30 is set to refocus participants on the financial benefits of addressing climate change, as well as the economic costs of ignoring it. 

It is believed this resounding message at November’s Brazil conference will replace repeated previous warnings of a world approaching breaking point, and in dire need of averting a fearful fate.

Instead, dialogue at this year's COP30 is anticipated to chime with growing global concerns and priorities around weakening economies, growing cost of living crises and rising unemployment levels.

The UN’s executive secretary of Framework Convention on Climate Change intends to convince attendees in Belem that the growth and profit they seek lies in green economic transition – by using clear cut examples used to make his point.

Through COP30, Simon Stiell will illustrate “the economic growth that can be stimulated through strong climate action.” [1]

It is anticipated that countries like Japan and China – having gained billions in investment and generated huge profits by embracing clean energy and green economic transition – will provide much of the case study material he presents in Belem.

Stiell told government officials visiting him in New York this month: “We’ve been speaking about the impacts on lives, livelihoods. It doesn’t get into other elements – the economic benefits of taking climate action and what this means in terms of jobs, food security, water security.”

So, Mr Stiell will also use COP30 to highlight the economic effects of the climate crisis on countries if their national plans for meeting the Paris agreement are neglected. 

According to an International Chamber of Commerce report which analysed 4,000 separate climate-related events – from flash floods that washed away homes to drawn-out droughts that crippled farming – extreme weather cost countries $2tn globally between 2014 and 2024. [2]

The ICC’s secretary-general John Denton reflected on the study: “Major productivity losses from extreme weather events are being felt in the here and now by the real economy.”

His views have been advanced recently by insurance industry leaders who have spelled out the consequences of coverage for climate-related risks becoming unviable and unavaiable.

Posting on his LinkedIn page, Allianz SE board member Günther Thallinger explained: “Extreme weather phenomena drive direct physical risks to all categories of human-owned assets – land, houses, roads, power lines, railways, ports, and factories. Heat and water destroy capital. Flooded homes lose value. Overheated cities become uninhabitable. Entire asset classes are degrading in real time. Entire regions are becoming uninsurable.

“If insurance is no longer available, other financial services become unavailable too. A house that cannot be insured cannot be mortgaged. No bank will issue loans for uninsurable property.

“That means no more mortgages, no new real estate development, no long-term investment, no financial stability. The financial sector as we know it ceases to function. And with it, capitalism as we know it ceases to be viable. There is no capitalism without functioning financial services.

“There is only one path forward: prevent any further increase in atmospheric energy levels. That means keeping emissions out of the atmosphere. That means burning less carbon.

“This is not about saving the planet. This is about saving the conditions under which markets, finance, and civilization itself can continue to operate.” [3]

And while delegates at COP30 may listen to alarming economic predictions more attentively than human ones, they could also note how the global private sector’s $2tn investment in low-carbon industry last year dwarfed it $1tn one in fossil fuel.

Money talks and perhaps the UN’s executive secretary of Framework Convention on Climate Change is correct to ask COP30 delegates to look at climate change with fresh eyes. The opportunities for economic growth and financial security that reside in green energy and economic transition remain relatively untapped. 

Now, for layered reasons, is the moment for government, industry and enterprise to embrace them. 

[1] The Guardian (2025, 20 September). ‘Something is working’: UN climate chief optimistic about green transition. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2025/sep/20/simon-stiell-un-climate-chief-climate-progress-green-transition

[2] The Guardian (2025, 11 November). Extreme weather cost $2tn globally over past decade, report finds. https://www.theguardian.com/business/2024/nov/11/extreme-weather-cost-2tn-globally-over-past-decade-report-finds

[3] LinkedIn, Gunther Thanlinger. (2025, March 25) Climate, Risk, Insurance: The Future of Capitalism. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/climate-risk-insurance-future-capitalism-g%C3%BCnther-thallinger-smw5f/

ADDITIONAL READING

International Energy Agency (IEA). (2021). Net Zero by 2050: A Roadmap for the Global Energy Sector. IEA, Paris. https://www.iea.org/reports/net-zero-by-2050